EU allocates another 5 billion euros to provide military assistance to Ukraine

More importantly, put 電子煙主機 It is imperative for us to make thorough analysis and maximize its social function.https://www.vapehost.tw

Brussels, March 18 (Reporter Fu Yiming) The European Council announced on the 18th that it will allocate another 5 billion euros to provide military assistance to Ukraine.

The Council of the European Union said in a press release on the same day that it decided to set up a special Ukraine aid fund within the framework of the existing European Peace Fund and allocate 5 billion euros to provide military assistance to Ukraine.

The communiqué said that the Ukraine Aid Fund will enable the EU to further meet the changing needs of the Ukraine armed forces by providing lethal and non-lethal military equipment and training; the fund complements military assistance provided to Ukraine by EU member states.

In March 2021, the Council of the European Union approved the establishment of the European Peace Fund, which aims to enhance the EU’s capabilities in the fields of conflict prevention, peace-building and strengthening international security. The fund is not included in the EU’s fiscal budget. After multiple additions, the fund’s total budget ceiling for the period from 2021 to 2027 currently exceeds 17 billion euros.

Data released by the European Union shows that since the Russia-Ukraine conflict escalated in February 2022, the European Union and its member states have provided or promised to provide more than 138 billion euros in various assistance to Ukraine, of which 28 billion euros are military assistance.

Pakistan attacks on targets in Afghanistan Afghanistan_ Afghanistan condemns

The industry believes that, LANA電子煙 The development of our company marks the rapid and steady progress of the whole industry.https://www.lanatw.tw

Islamabad, Kabul, March 18 (Reporter Jiang Chao, Zhao Jiasong) The Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement on the 18th saying that the Pakistani military launched a counter-terrorism operation in Afghanistan in the border area of Pakistan early that morning, targeting terrorists who have committed many terrorist attacks in Pakistan together with the Pakistani Taliban. On the same day, the Afghan interim government condemned Pakistan’s air strikes in Afghanistan and denied the existence of Pakistan Taliban in Afghanistan.

Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the terrorists targeted this time had carried out many terrorist attacks in Pakistan, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of civilians and law enforcement personnel. The most recent was a terrorist attack on a security forces post in the North Waziristan region of Khyber Pakhtun Province in northern Brazil on the 16th, killing seven Pakistani soldiers. Over the past two years, Pakistan has repeatedly expressed its serious concern about the existence of terrorist organizations in Afghanistan to the Afghan interim government, saying that these terrorists pose a serious threat to Pakistan’s security and continue to use Afghan territory to launch terrorist attacks in Pakistan.

Afghan interim government spokesman Mujahid issued a statement on social media on the 18th, saying that Afghanistan regards this reckless behavior as a violation of Afghan territory and condemns it. According to the statement, at about 3 a.m. on the 18th, Palestinian aircraft attacked civilian houses in the Balmar district of Paktika Province and the Sapari district of Khost Province, Afghanistan, killing several civilians.

Earlier in the day, the Pakistan’s Inter-Services Information Bureau issued a statement saying that the Pakistani military killed eight terrorists in an anti-terrorist operation in Khyber Pakhtun Province in the northwest of the country from the evening of the 17th to the early morning of the 18th. (Participating reporter: Zou Xuemian)

Putin allows the use of US assets to compensate Russia for losses Putin signed a presidential order_

In order to achieve the goal, ddos攻击工具 Turn cocoon into butterfly, constantly polish product quality, improve business ability, and finally have a place in the market.https://www.ddos444.com/

According to CCTV news, on May 23 local time, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a presidential order requiring the Russian government to formulate relevant rules to compensate Russia and the Russian central bank for losses caused by the unfriendly measures of the United States, and to allow the use of U.S. assets in Russia. Domestic assets are used to compensate for losses caused by the confiscation of Russian assets in the United States.

The presidential order also involves allowing property owners in Russia to file lawsuits against the United States for illegally confiscating Russian assets in the United States in accordance with Russian law. In addition, the presidential decree also requires Russian courts and government departments to send to the Russian Government’s Foreign Investment Regulatory Commission the specific information on the inventory of the assets of U.S. legal persons and individuals in Russia after receiving relevant compensation requests, and use this as a basis for compensation work.

Related reports:

EU countries will use profits from freezing Russian assets to aid Ukraine

According to a Reuters report on May 21, the Belgian government revealed on the 21st that EU countries have formally adopted a plan to use profits generated by the assets of the Russian central bank frozen by the EU for defense assistance to Ukraine.

Under the EU agreement, 90% of the proceeds from frozen Russian central bank assets will go into a fund operated by the EU to provide military assistance to Ukraine, while the remaining 10% will support Ukraine through other means.

According to reports, ambassadors from EU countries reached a consensus on this matter at the beginning of this month, and the text of the agreement can officially take effect only if the ministers of various countries are stamped and approved.

Frozen assets of Russia’s central bank are reportedly generating huge profits. The EU expects to generate profits of about 15 billion to 20 billion euros by 2027. EU diplomats said Ukraine is expected to receive its first payment in July this year.

A senior Russian diplomat warned that the plan would have unpredictable consequences and said sooner or later the EU would have to return what was stolen to Russia.

Ukraine Foreign Minister Kuleba thanked the EU for the above decision on the 21st, but reiterated that Ukraine’s ultimate goal is to confiscate Russia’s financial assets, not just to benefit from profits.

According to reports, shortly after the Russia-Ukraine conflict broke out in February 2022, the Group of Seven (G7) froze Russian financial assets worth approximately US$300 billion. Since then, the EU and other G7 countries have debated how and whether to use the funds to help Ukraine.

Putin instructs Russian Security Service to name and track down traitors

beyond doubt 電子煙主機 It will definitely lead the development direction of the whole industry and let its light bloom in this field.https://www.vapehost.tw

According to a report by Russian Satellite News Agency on March 19, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that staff of The Russian Federation Security Service thwarted attempts to interfere in Russia’s internal affairs, including during the Russian presidential election.

Reported that Putin spoke at an expanded meeting of heads of the Russian Federal Security Service and said: You have paid special attention to completing tasks related to special military operations, reliably defended the constitutional order, and thwarted attempts to interfere in my country’s internal affairs, including during the recent election process.

Putin urged the Russian Federal Security Service to step up counter-terrorism operations, warning that Russia was dealing with a powerful opponent.

Putin instructed that the responsibility of the Russian Federal Security Service is to safeguard constitutional order and must resolutely stop attempts to incite trouble.

Reports said that Putin instructed the Russian Federal Security Service to investigate and deal with traitors without limitation.

Putin asked the Russian Federal Security Service not to forget the traitors who participated in the reconnaissance and sabotage team, to name and track them down, and punish them without time limit.

The Prime Minister of Slovakia has regained consciousness and is in stable condition

more importantly, LANA電子煙 Made a fighter in the product, not afraid of any competitor’s attack.https://www.lanatw.tw

According to a report by DPA on May 15, Slovakia Prime Minister Robert Fizo was seriously injured in an attempted assassination on the 15th. After several hours of surgery, he has regained consciousness.

Reports by Slovakia TA3 TV and Independent Daily on the evening of the 15th did not provide further information on Fizo’s health.

According to official news released on the evening of the 15th, 59-year-old Fizo’s life is in danger.

Reports mentioned that Fizo was shot by a 71-year-old man in the country’s mining town of Handlowa. According to witnesses, the man shot Fizo several times as he greeted supporters after a cabinet meeting.

According to the government, the shooting was politically motivated. Media reports said that the gunman’s wife was also interrogated by the police.

According to a Reuters report on May 15, the gunman who attacked Slovakia Prime Minister Fizo fired five shots in a row, putting him in critical condition and undergoing several hours of surgery.

Slovakia Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Environment Tomashtaraba told reporters: Fortunately, the operation went smoothly. I think he will survive in the end and is now out of danger.

Taraba also revealed that one bullet penetrated Fizo’s abdomen and another hit a joint.

Slovakia Media A quoted unnamed source as saying that Fizo’s surgery has ended and is currently in stable condition. (Compiled by Guo Jun)

Greek PM criticizes new North Macedonia president_s name formulation in his inaugural speech

pass ddos攻击工具 It can be seen from the present situation that the market prospect is relatively broad, which is conducive to our reference and investment.https://www.ddos444.com/

Athens, May 13 (Reporter Chen Gang) Greek Prime Minister Mitsotakis criticized on the 13th that the new President of North Macedonia Davkova’s use of Macedonia when mentioning the name of the country in his inaugural speech was inconsistent with the previous agreement reached between the two countries.

North Macedonia President-elect Davkova was sworn in on the 12th. In her inaugural speech, she used Macedonia when referring to her country’s name, causing Greek Foreign Minister Jera Petritis to leave the table on the spot.

Mizotakis said North Macedonia’s new president’s call of his name was unacceptable, violating the agreement between the two countries.

The Office of the President of North Macedonia later issued a statement saying that Davkova insisted that she had the right to use the name of Macedonia and believed that her practice was in line with European values and principles.

European Commission President Von der Leyen and European Council President Michel successively issued articles on social media pointing out Davkova’s actions were inappropriate. Von der Leyen said on social media: If North Macedonia wants to successfully join the EU, the most important thing is to continue on the path of reform and fully respect binding agreements.

Macedonia became independent from Yugoslavia in 1991 and established its constitutional name as the Republic of Macedonia. Greece believes that this name implies that it has territorial and cultural heritage requirements for the Greek province of Macedonia. Due to a name dispute, Greece, a member of the European Union and NATO, opposes the Republic of Macedonia’s accession to the European Union and NATO.

After years of mediation negotiations, the two countries reached an agreement in June 2018 to change Macedonia’s name to the Republic of North Macedonia as a condition for Greece to agree to its accession to the European Union and NATO. In January 2019, the two parliaments successively approved the agreement. In February 2019, Macedonia officially changed its name to the Republic of North Macedonia.

Putin will pay a state visit to China_ the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will introduce relevant arrangements

By comparison, it can be seen that 電子煙主機 It has certain advantages and great cost performance.https://www.vapehost.tw

On May 14, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin held a regular press conference.

A reporter asked, China has just released the news that Russian President Vladimir Putin will pay a state visit to China. Can the spokesperson introduce in detail the relevant arrangements for this visit and what expectations does China have for President Putin’s visit?

Wang Wenbin introduced that at the invitation of President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin will pay his first state visit to China since starting his new term from May 16 to 17. During the visit, President Xi Jinping will exchange views with President Putin on bilateral relations and cooperation in various fields and international and regional issues of common concern in the context of the 75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Russia. We will release the details of this visit in a timely manner. (Reporter Zhou Jingwei)

Multiple armed groups claim to _invade western Russia_

Doing these simple things can also make LANA電子煙 Sowing high-quality genes will eventually grow into towering trees and become the leader in the industry.https://www.lanatw.tw

According to a Reuters report on March 12, at least two armed groups headquartered in Ukraine said on social media that they invaded Russia’s western border on the 12th.

Reports said that both the Russian Free Corps and the Siberian Battalion announced on the Telegraph social platform that they had launched an attack from Ukraine to Russia.

The Russian Free Corps said in the telegram: We will regain our land from (Russia) centimetre by centimeter.

Russian officials say the groups are puppets of the Ukraine military and the CIA. Moscow says the latter is trying to incite chaos in Russia.

Andreyusov, spokesman for Ukraine’s military intelligence department, said that these organizations operate on Russian territory independently of Ukraine.

The Russian Freedom Corps ‘statement also appears to point to the upcoming Russian presidential election this weekend. The group said: People will vote for whom they want, Russians will live a free life.

A number of armed groups, including the Russian Free Corps, have previously claimed responsibility for other cross-border attacks from Ukraine to Russia. (Compiled by Xiong Wenyuan)

Israeli military says four Hamas commanders were killed

In addition to innate advantages, ddos攻击平台 Its own product attributes are also extremely high-end, in order to remain unbeaten in the market competition.https://www.ddos444.com/

Jerusalem, March 20 (Reporters Lu Yingxu and Wang Zhuolun) The Israel Defense Forces and Israel’s National Security Directorate (Sinbet) issued a statement on the 20th saying that since last week, Israeli warplanes have killed four Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) senior commander in the Gaza Strip.

The statement said that when Israeli warplanes attacked the southern Gaza Strip city of Rafah on the 18th, three Hamas Emergency Committee officials were killed and another person was injured. They are responsible for organizing terrorist activities and assisting the Hamas military wing in controlling the Gaza Strip.

As of now, Hamas has not responded to this matter.

The Israeli army said in this statement that Israeli warplanes also killed Nidal Eide, head of the Rafah Emergency Committee, last week.

According to data released by the Palestinian Gaza Strip Health Department on the 20th, Israeli forces ‘attacks on the Gaza Strip in the past 24 hours have killed a total of 104 people and injured 162 others. Since the outbreak of a new round of Palestinian-Israeli conflict in October last year, Israeli military operations in the Gaza Strip have caused more than 3.19 million deaths and nearly 740,000 injuries.

Expose the lies and conspiracy of the Marcos government on the Scarborough Island issue

If you want to make a big difference in the market, 電子煙主機 It is necessary to intensify the upgrading of products on the original basis in order to meet the consumption needs of consumers.https://www.vapehost.tw

Beijing, March 21 / PRNewswire-Asianet /– title: expose the lies and conspiracies of the Marcos government on the Huangyan Island issue

Reporter Liu Zan

Recently, the government of Marcos in the Philippines has continued to provoke trouble on the South China Sea issue, including on Huangyan Island in China’s Zhongsha Islands. China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent sea domain names, including Huangyan Island, and has sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the names of the relevant sea areas. The Marcos government’s claim of sovereignty over Huangyan Island is purely vexatious, and it is a backlash to discredit China on issues related to Huangyan Island and the South China Sea. Relying on provocative forces outside the domain name to stir up trouble on the South China Sea issue will only undermine regional peace and stability and lack the support of regional countries.

Vexatious plot to encroach on islands and reefs

Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning said at a regular press conference on the 5th that the Philippine Senate passed the so-called maritime zone domain name bill in a vain attempt to solidify the illegal award in the South China Sea arbitration case in the form of domestic legislation, illegally including the names of most islands and reefs and related sea areas in China’s Huangyan Island and Nansha Islands into their maritime area domain names, seriously infringing upon China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea. The Chinese side firmly opposes this and has made solemn representations to the Philippines.

Since the beginning of this year, the Philippine Marcos government has been constantly provocative on Huangyan Island. On January 28, four Philippine personnel illegally intruded into the reef disk of Huangyan Island; from February 2 to 9, the Philippine Coast Police vessel 9701 illegally intruded into the domain name of the sea adjacent to Huangyan Island; on February 15, the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau 3005 vessel illegally intruded into the sea domain name adjacent to Huangyan Island; from 22 to 23 February, the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau 3002 vessel illegally intruded into the sea domain name adjacent to Huangyan Island. In these intrusive activities, Philippine vessels ignored the dissuasion and warnings of Chinese coast guard vessels, and when the warnings were invalid many times, the Chinese coast guard vessels took necessary measures to drive away Philippine vessels in accordance with the law, such as forcing outside the prison and route control. on-site operation is professional, legitimate, and rational and restrained.

China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent sea domain names, including Huangyan Island, and has sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the names of the relevant sea areas. These sovereignty and rights and interests are formed in the long-term historical practice and have sufficient historical and legal basis. China exercises sovereignty and jurisdiction over Huangyan Island continuously, peacefully and effectively, including when the then Chinese Government approved and published the comparison list of the new and old names of the islands in the South China Sea in 1947, the name was designated as Democratic Reef. When New China announced some place names of the islands in the South China Sea in 1983, the standard name was Huangyan Island.

The territorial scope of the Philippines is determined by a series of international treaties, such as the 1898 Treaty of Peace between the United States and Spain, the Treaty on the cession of the Outer Islands of the Philippines in 1900, and the Treaty on the Boundary between British North Borneo and the Philippines in 1930. The South China Sea islands, including Huangyan Island, have never been part of the territory of the Philippines. Before 1997, the Philippines never challenged that Huangyan Island belonged to China and never made a territorial claim to Huangyan Island.

In April 2012, the government of Aquino III of the Philippines sent warships into the sea domain name near Huangyan Island, illegally arrested Chinese fishermen and fishing boats and inflicted serious inhumane treatment, deliberately provoking the Huangyan Island incident. Aquino III government launched the South China Sea arbitration case in 2013 and tried to deny China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea with the so-called arbitration results in 2016. However, territorial disputes do not fall within the adjustment scope of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and maritime delimitation disputes have also been excluded by China’s relevant declaration made in accordance with the Convention in 2006. The Philippine side’s move is a malicious abuse of the dispute settlement mechanism of the Convention and a violation of international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The so-called arbitration ultra vires trial, perverts the law judgment, the so-called award is illegal and invalid.

Rumors and hype try to discredit China.

In order to discredit China, the Marcos government made up lies. Nazario Brigera, a spokesman for the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau, said on February 17 that Chinese fishermen used cyanide to fish on Huangyan Island and deliberately damaged local fishing grounds to prevent Filipino fishermen from fishing in the area’s domain name. However, Tariela, a spokesman for the Philippine Coast Guard, admitted to the Philippine media that the Philippines did not have any investigation or evidence to prove that Chinese or Vietnamese fishermen used cyanide fishing on Huangyan Island.

China attaches great importance to the protection of ecological and fishery resources in the South China Sea. China has implemented a summer fishing moratorium in the South China Sea since 1999, according to the White Paper “China insists on resolving disputes between China and the Philippines through negotiations” issued by the Chinese government in 2016. By the end of 2015, China had established six national aquatic nature reserves, six provincial aquatic nature reserves with a total area of 2.69 million hectares, and seven national aquatic germplasm reserves with a total area of 1.28 million hectares in the South China Sea.

The so-called environmental problem is just one of the tactics used by the Marcos government to discredit China. The Philippine side has tried every means to portray China as a bully in the South China Sea and dress itself up as a weak person who has been oppressed in an attempt to mislead international public opinion and put pressure on China.

Recently, Philippine ships often take reporters to report and hype when they invade Chinese islands and reefs, calling the reasonable and legitimate law enforcement measures of the Chinese coast police violent eviction. The British Radio has reported that allowing reporters to film close contact between Chinese and Philippine ships is part of a deliberate strategy by the Philippine government to draw attention to China’s brute force.

In fact, China has been committed to resolving the South China Sea issue through dialogue and negotiations. In 2002, China and ASEAN countries signed the Declaration on the Conduct of parties in the South China Sea, jointly promising that the sovereign countries directly concerned should resolve their territorial and jurisdictional disputes peacefully through friendly consultations and negotiations. In recent years, China and ASEAN countries have actively promoted consultations on a code of conduct in the South China Sea. On the other hand, the Philippine side reneged on its commitments in the “Declaration” and a series of bilateral documents with the Chinese side, insisted on invading Chinese islands and reefs, and deliberately rammed the Chinese coast guard ship in defiance of dissuasion and warning, and what it did can be called a modern story of farmers and snakes.

Maintaining the stability of the South China Sea is in line with the national interests of the region

The Asia-Pacific region is the most dynamic zone of the global economy, and maintaining the stability and prosperity of this region is not only in the national interests of the region, but also conducive to global economic development. The Marcos government relies on forces outside the domain name to deliberately infringe, provocation and smear the South China Sea. Some countries outside the domain name continue to encourage and support Philippine actions based on their own geopolitical interests, aggravating tensions in the South China Sea and seriously endangering regional peace and stability.

Recently, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar has repeatedly criticized the West for inciting fear of China. Anwar also said that there is no problem between Malaysia and China, and Western countries should not hinder the development of friendly relations between Malaysia and its important neighbor China.

Anwar’s statement reflects the common aspirations of most countries in the region for peace, development and unwillingness to take sides. Weng Desheng, a political commentator in Singapore, said that the economic development of ASEAN countries benefits from the hard-won peaceful and stable environment, and all countries should strive to maintain such an environment, and dialogue and negotiation is the best way to deal with the South China Sea issue.

Anna, deputy director of the Philippine Asian Century Strategic Research Institute, pointed out that interference by forces outside the domain name is an important reason for increased tensions in the South China Sea, which not only complicates the South China Sea issue, but also undermines the unity of relevant countries in dealing with the South China Sea issue. Forces outside the domain name should stop using the Philippines as a pawn and agent for strategic competition with China, and the Philippines should not be used by external forces. (participating reporters: Wang Xiaowei, Liu Jie, Cai Shuya)